Saturday, July 15, 2006

Problem With Wild Eyed Left

The liberals who perpetually run their mouths and carp and whine about George Bush sit silently while human rights abuses continue around the world. The feminists who bitch and moan about women membership at Augusta National Golf Club sit silently while young girls are routinely abused. How can this be. Ol' BC has a theory. Neither cares about atrocities and abuses to mankind. They've made it abundantly clear by their actions, it's all about power.

Moonbat Monitor had a piece on breast ironing young girls. Where is the outrage? Martha Burke, why the silence? No TV cameras?

"They cried and said it was painful. But I explained that it was for their own
good."
"Breast ironing" -- the use of hard or heated objects or other
substances to try to stunt breast growth in girls -- is a traditional practice
in West Africa, experts say.


So, that brings us back to the original point. The liberals and socialists who whine about some terrorist being subjected to some level of discomfort, sit quietly by as young girls are tortured. The left, those of numerous "human rights" issues in the past, have no interest in addressing any issue that doesn't directly result in criticism of George Bush.

But, then again, many of them contend that George Bush caused Hurricane Katrina. And some people still vote for these morons.

Just a thought.

7 Comments:

At 5:33 PM, Blogger Sir Loin of Beef said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

 
At 5:47 PM, Blogger Sir Loin of Beef said...

I find it funny that a man who addresses whiners does it with non-stop whining.

 
At 9:15 PM, Blogger Ol' BC said...

But what better way, even if I miss it when I reread it.

 
At 9:49 PM, Blogger Sir Loin of Beef said...

You missed it? Hmmm. Well, a semantic difference, I suppose.

I find the conservative mindset very interesting. (I know you may or may not belong solely to this category, but as a point of reference it will suffice.)

I have lately been thinking about the conservatives and it seems to me that they are, at least more so than liberals, defined not by what they are for, but what they are against, as though an enemy is necessary to define them. Ann Coulter is a good example. I would think she owes the liberals a great deal considering all of her books are aimed against them. Without the liberals, her identity would be greatly reduced.

The rest of the conservative world is likewise against communism, terrorism, socialism, abortion, liberalism etc. I don't see the liberal rhetoric taking these sorts of avenues as much. When Bush claimed to be a uniter and not a divider, everyone should have been extremely wary, for this is the traditional conservative tactic, to divide and define themselves in relation to the enemy. Of corurse he went on to become exactly what he said he wasn't, but that is another debate.

I am veering off the subject here, but at least half of your posts are aimed at the stupidity of the liberals. I call this whining. We could argue semantics, but we are not in grammer class...

Anyway, I find it interesting.

 
At 2:53 PM, Blogger moonbat monitor said...

thanks for the props.

didn't know I was on your blogroll, I'll add you to my main one too.

thanks again,
-MM

 
At 3:01 PM, Blogger Ol' BC said...

I appreciate that MM. Keep up the good work!!

 
At 3:40 PM, Blogger Ol' BC said...

Beef,
The libs aren't against socialism, communism, etc.So, naturally they aren't vocally opposing such things. That is what most liberals are for(or at least programs that encourage such things.) Most conservatives are for less government intervention into our lives, less stealing by the government in the form of taxes and increased opportunity for all people. The libs on the other hand profess just the opposite by their actions. They want to keep the poor in their place by keeping them dependent on government stipends and handouts and discouraging any attempt to improve oneself. The MSM is markedly in the corner of the left so it probably seems at first glance as you described it, but those in the center or on the right must address the socialistic plans of the left in a negative way or it would get rammed right on the people of this country. The lefts very plans stifle any work ethic which is why Russia's rapid economic growth has not been
greater. They have a whole generation of people (or more) who don't know how to and never had to work.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home