Sunday, October 14, 2007

Global Warming - Theory Debunked

Thank goodness there are a few real scientists left. One of them, Dr. William Gray, doesn't hesitate to point out the falsehoods of the Algore and his buddies, at least according to this article.

Dr Gray, whose annual forecasts of the number of tropical storms and
hurricanes are widely publicised, said a natural cycle of ocean water
temperatures - related to the amount of salt in ocean water - was responsible
for the global warming that he acknowledges has taken place.
However, he
said, that same cycle meant a period of cooling would begin soon and last for
several years.
"We'll look back on all of this in 10 or 15 years and realise
how foolish it was," Dr Gray said.


Wow! No wonder this guy gets virtually no ink in the main stream media. He is 180 degrees from the crap they are spewing. The difference - Dr. Gray is a scientist and a well respected one at that. He understands these cycles in global tempuratures.


Dr. Gray goes on to say -

"It bothers me that my fellow scientists are not speaking out against something
they know is wrong," he said. "But they also know that they'd never get any
grants if they spoke out. I don't care about grants."


Hmmmm. Could this garbage be about money? Imagine that. Maybe Dr. Gray should make a movie.

Just a thought.

5 Comments:

At 12:10 AM, Blogger RightWingRocker said...

Global warming freaks have fallen for this hoax hook, line, and sinker. One of my favorite moments was when Penn and Teller sent some people in to a "march on Washington" to get them to sign a petition to ban dihydrogen monoxide.

Far too many people fell for it, which proves just how intensely the Left has mesmerized its followers.

These freaks are more dangerous than the Branch Davidians.

RWR
www.rightwingrocker.com

 
At 8:33 PM, Anonymous mark said...

One man's garbage is another man's truth. You simply choose to believe one set of data while others choose to believe another. You are not making an argument. You are simply choosing one belief over another.

 
At 6:50 AM, Anonymous mark said...

One other thought...

If the possibility exists that man is creating the problem, and that the efforts to clean up the problem will have other benefits for human beings, such as cleaner air, then does it not behoove us to make an effort to improve our world?

Even if the problem is not man-made, is it not in our best interest to preserve the air we breathe and the water we drink? It just seems like common sense to me to take measures to preserve our lives on this earth if we can. If we reduce green house gasses in the bargain, then is there are discernible harm?

Somehow, I don't think it can be argued that we shouldn't at least try to clean up our act, so to speak. The benefits to health and future well being far outweigh any monetary costs.

 
At 12:05 AM, Blogger Texas Truth said...

Of course global warming exists. I have been getting hotter for years!!! LOL

The earth will reach a critical period in warmth when I finally get that date with Raquel Welch, Ann-Margret, and Marsha Brady on the same night.

I am willing to bet my house the latter happens before the former.

Imagine that: Texas Truth on a date with Raquel Welch, Ann-Margret, and Marsha Brady on the same night. OPPS..SORRY..Please don't. I do not want that image in your mind to upset your stomach. LOL :)

 
At 3:14 AM, Blogger RightWingRocker said...

Even if the problem is not man-made, is it not in our best interest to preserve the air we breathe and the water we drink?

Sure... if WE feel like it.

Problem is that when liberals say "we", they're not talking about "us". They're talking about YOU being forced by the government to do whatever THEY think "we" should do.

If you want to stop breathing and drinking water, that's on you. I for one, will do as I please, and you and your government agencies can go fuck yourselves.

If we reduce green house gasses in the bargain, then is there are discernible harm?

Greenhouse gases don't cause discernible harm, so this is just a bunch of Algorean psychobabble. Once you start dealing with facts, you'll get the message.

Somehow, I don't think it can be argued that we shouldn't at least try to clean up our act, so to speak. The benefits to health and future well being far outweigh any monetary costs.

Then spend your own money on it. There's nothing wrong with MY act that needs to be cleaned up, and I don't acknowledge that there's anything to clean up in the first place. People's health and futures are their own business. You should leave them to it and mind your own.

RWR
www.rightwingrocker.com

 

Post a Comment

<< Home